The HHS program was designed to provide tools to minimize drug use risk, including money for testing equipment for sexually transmitted diseases, overdose reversal medication, and medication lock boxes.
#TWEETADDER 4 CRACK CRACK#
Spokesperson Jorge Silva told PolitiFact that the mention of crack pipes went beyond the information the department gave the reporter. The story quoted an unnamed spokesman for HHS saying that the program would "provide pipes for users to smoke crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and ‘any illicit substance.’" 7 story was headlined, "Biden Admin To Fund Crack Pipe Distribution To Advance ‘Racial Equity.’" "Harm reduction" is a policy initiative that seeks to reduce injury and death from drug use while accepting, at least in the short term, that people may continue using drugs.
#TWEETADDER 4 CRACK FREE#
The uproar stemmed from a Washington Free Beacon report about a Department of Health and Human Services "substance harm reduction grant" that had been announced earlier. These claims contain elements of truth, but they leave out significant context, due in part to evolving messaging by the Biden administration. Rubio later introduced a bill called the Cutting off Rampant Access to Crack Kits (or CRACK) Act, to "prohibit any funds from directly or indirectly purchasing, supplying, or distributing crack pipes or similar drug paraphernalia." "There is no end in sight for this lunacy." Marco Rubio, R-Fla., posted on the platform. "Biden is sending free meth & crack pipes to minority communities in the name of ‘racial equity,’" U.S.
"Biden crime policy: Crack pipes for all. "The Biden Administration cut funding for monoclonal treatment of COVID but is spending $30 million on crack pipes," former Trump press secretary Sean Spicer wrote on Twitter on Feb.
“One wonders if, as a US-based company, Twitter's leadership might just care a little bit less about democracy and justice for Indians versus at home,” she said.Conservative commentators recently set off a firestorm by accusing the federal government of spending $30 million to provide Americans with pipes to smoke illicit substances, including crack cocaine. Truschke, however, feels that the charge of preferential treatment to US citizens can’t be ignored. “Whereas in the US, that division and that boundary between social ‘offence’ and legal prosecution is much better and well defined.” IFF is currently challenging the confidentiality requirement in the Delhi High Court. “We quite often see that if people are offended by something (in India), there is a way that a police complaint can be filed or a court case can be initiated,” Gupta said. There is also the matter of cultural differences between the two countries. While India’s Constitution also protects free expression, the government can overturn these using the ‘reasonable restrictions’ clause “in the interests the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence”. This confidentiality clause “creates a bizarre situation where citizens have the right to challenge blocking of online content but they are unable to do so because they don't have access to these legal orders,” IFF wrote in a Gupta said Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, which the government invoked on Monday, prevents intermediaries like Twitter from disclosing any information about blocking of an account or tweet to the public. In India, by contrast, the government relies on the Information Technology Act to issue withholding requests, ban applications such as We Transfer, websites such as DuckDuckGo, and control the flow of information on the internet without public knowledge, said Apar Gupta, executive director of digital rights advocacy organisation, International Freedom Foundation (IFF). What is doing in India, shutting down accounts on the government’s behest, while apparently speaking truth… - Aatish Taseer 1612177250000
0 kommentar(er)
